An interesting tidbit about the Senate healthcare bill that you may find fascinating or maddening depending on your political stripe is the tanning bed tax that will be levied on people who are looking for that summertime glow. Yes, a 10% tax on all indoor tanning services is included in the Senate healthcare bill.

[picappgallerysingle id="7355075"]

The Senators from hell replaced the Botox tax with the Indoor tanning tax. I suppose Tanning Salons fall under cosmetic healthcare in one way or another according to the brain trust in Washington. But then again, why should any cosmetic surgery or cosmetic procedure or any kind be considered healthcare at all? I suppose that’s a debate unto itself.

The tanning bed tax is included in an amendment added to the original Senate healthcare bill, but no biggie, this amendment is only 383 pages long. You’ll find the tanning bed tax located in the section titled “Cosmetic Procedures”.

Is going to a tanning bed a cosmetic procedure? Who says so? And how is it related to healthcare? Because some folks say it causes skin cancer? So if you visit a tanning bed your insurance premiums should be higher? Who are these people that we’ve sent to Washington to do the work of the people?

Considering the tanning bed tax, I wonder how many other hidden jewels are included in this wonderful piece of legislation? Nancy Pelosi probably petitioned Reid to drop the Botox tax and replace it with this idiocy. But then again, she does look awfully tan most of the time.

H/T Ace